ECHR. CASE OF KOLESNIKOVA v. RUSSIA. Infringement of art. 6 § 1 of the Convention
Art 6 § 1 • Impartial tribunal • Rejection of a non-abusive recusal request of all the judges of a tribunal who decided themselves on the recusal against them • The Court of Cassation did not remedy the litigation deficiencies. Assessment of the Court 49. ...
ECHR. Lascau v. Romania. Breach of art. 6 § 1 of the Convention
Motivation of the Court The Court refers to the general principles governing the application method of art. 6 of the Convention on appeal proceedings, which it recalled in the case of Găitănaru versus Romania (paragraphs 26-28, 26th June 2012; see also Flueraș versus...
ECHR. SÜLEYMAN v. TURKEY. Infringement of art. 6 § 1 and § 3 (d) of the Convention
The applicant complained that the fairness of the criminal proceedings against him had been tainted owing to his alleged inability to confront and question the only eyewitness to the shooting of M.Ü., namely witness X, in person. Application of the principles The...
ECHR. Dan v. the Republic of Moldova. Infrigement of Art. 6 of the Convention
The Court notes from the outset the Government’s argument that the applicant had agreed to the reading out of the statements of the absent witnesses during the hearing. The Court notes that indeed the applicant, who had been acquitted at first instance, did not...
